Saturday, 29 February 2020

INVISIBLE WOMEN



MOVIE
The Invisible Man
Elizabeth Moss, Oliver Jackson-Cohen
Director Leigh Whannell
Review Ray Chan


The Blumhouse studio is notoriously hit and miss, with the stale Fantasy Island the most recent casualty, bombing on all levels.
    But when it’s good, it’s very very good, exemplified by Universal’s latest entry in its classic horror cinematic universe, The Invisible Man, which follows on from the first movie in the series, The Mummy.
    Screenplay writer and director Leigh Whannell recognises that superficial shock and awe seem to be remnants of the past these days, and looks elsewhere for the scares. Indeed, filmgoers are now so used to special effects that not even the grisliest of made-up monsters can inflict more than just the feeblest of frights.
    The real horrors are the ones that do not disappear when the lights come up, those that lurk just outside the theatre doors, and, as the movie’s name metaphorically suggests, lie invisible within the community.
    That’s where this offering, like its stablemate Get Out, are so effective, as Whannell injects the classic H.G. Wells novel with verisimilitude and relevance.
    The story involves Cecilia (Elizabeth Moss), who has recently escaped her abusive boyfriend, optics scientist Adrian Griffin (Oliver Jackson-Cohen), and is now staying at the house of her friend James and his daughter.
    When Cecilia learns from Adrian’s brother that he committed suicide and left her several million dollars, it seems that she is safe, but still feels uneasy as she is tormented by an unseen attacker.
    Cecilia is convinced that Adrian is somehow still with her, but no one believes her, including her friends and her sister Alice. Is Adrian indeed haunting her from beyond, or is there something more sinister afoot?
    The camera floats from scene to scene, imbuing a sense of dread and foreboding in even the most ordinary settings.
    The nature of the antagonist is such that the audience never knows where the next attack is coming from, even when it’s looking right at it, and so the scares evoke real tension and fear – somewhat akin to guessing when the shark would strike next in Jaws.
    At the crux of the matter is the issue of domestic violence 
 the real invisible menace here  and the movie’s impact is certainly made that much stronger because of current events involving Harvey Weinstein, and closer to home, the Hannah Clarke tragedy.
    Indeed, in many cases of violence in the home, it's often the victimised females whose plights go unseen. Those who have experienced this kind of trauma may feel uncomfortable as the film may bring those feelings to the fore.
    But while the fears under the spotlight are real, The Invisible Man uses them as fuel for its effectiveness, never mocking them, and always taking them seriously.
    As thoughtful as it's entertaining, as disturbing as it's frightening, the movie stays with you after you leave the cinema, proving its true worth indeed as a horror offering par excellence.

 #theinvisibleman#  #universal#




Monday, 10 February 2020

SHINY JEWELL



MOVIE
Richard Jewell
Paul Michael Hauser, Kathy Bates
Director Clint Eastwood
Review Ray Chan

BASED on true events, this movie recounts the cautionary tale of Richard Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser), the security guard who made national news in 1996 – first as a hero, when he discovered a satchel of bombs in Atlanta’s Centennial Park during the Summer Olympics and helped lead spectators away from the blast zone, then as a villain, depicted as a frustrated law enforcement wannabe who might have planted the explosives in order to glorify himself as a saviour.
    Jewell is a dreamer obsessed with carving out a career in the police force, painstakingly conscientious in his endeavours to maintain law and order, even going beyond his duties to targeting traffic offenders while employed as a college security officer.

    As a chunky, solitary and awkward individual still living at home with his mother (Kathy Bates), he became a suspect simply because the FBI believed his profile suited that of a tyro terrorist who wanted his 15 minutes of fame.
    The movie takes viewers through the media circus that enveloped Jewell and his small circle of family and friends, including the lawyer he hires to defend him, Watson Bryant (Sam Rockwell).
    Big and boyish at the same time, he exudes an aura of naivete and innocence, as he comes to grips with his new-found fame, initially disbelieving that he is seriously being considered a person of interest.
    The defining characteristic of Hauser’s performance early on is an earnest eagerness to help in the investigation in any way he can, an attribute that is quickly taken advantage of by FBI agents, who – led by the uncompromising Jon Hamm – believe Jewell of such low intellect that they try to prise a signed declaration of guilt from him.
    While initially unfailingly deferential, insisting on the existence of a professional kinship with his persecutors – even as they conceal their snickers at his references to “cop-to-cop” camaraderie – the burly babe in the woods eventually comes to realise the contempt in which he’s held, an epiphany that is emotionally heartfelt and poignant.
    Thanks to the resilience of the prickly Bryant, though, Jewell gradually gains a semblance of self-worth, while quickly losing faith in the religion of authority.
    Hauser’s portrayal of the child-like titular character is wonderful, and viewers cannot help but warm to the only son who just wanted to serve on the side of the law and make his mama proud.
    The movie ends on a melancholy note when, several years later, Bryant tells an exonerated Jewell – who has made his way back into a police desk job – that the real bomber has confessed to the crime.
    But he doesn’t show any satisfaction, his capacity to participate in the system forever disturbed.
    Gone is the ambitious swagger of the campus cop, now disaffected to the point of simple self-reflection, and questioning himself if he really is content to wear the badge.


#richardjewell #buzzmarketing#




Thursday, 6 February 2020

A WIN FOR QUINN



MOVIE
Birds of Prey
Margot Robbie, Ewan McGregor
Director Cathy Yan
Review Ray Chan


THE eccentric Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) has broken up with her psychopathic lover, the Joker, with whom she had a relationship in 2016’ mediocrely-received Suicide Squad.
    And now, without the big J’s protection, the scatter-brained Harleen Quinzel faces a life confronting previous enemies ready to cash in on karma, to the extent that she can’t even eat an egg sandwich without being pursued by a variety of riff raff that she has managed to offend in the past.
    That’s the basic setup as director Cathy Yan jumps around haphazardly in time, from mere hours ago to several weeks before, and then even further back to ‘80s Sicily, as she tries to introduce the players in this all-female ensemble.
    Surrounding Harley on centre stage are Dinah Lance/Black Canary (Jurnee Smollett-Bell), an employee of the movie’s villain, Roman Sionis (Ewan McGregor); Renee Montoya (Rosie Perez), a detective whose accomplishments go unrecognised; young pickpocketing thief Cassandra Cain (Ella Jay Basco); and The Huntress (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), a staple DC Comics character given a light-hearted treatment in the movie, and the recipient of many comedic scenes.
    Although the adventure is set in Gotham, there's no appearance of a certain caped crusader, or even the estranged prince of clowns. Which is a good thing, for there is little need for such cameos.
    Certainly, there are some frustrating plot inconsistencies. However, such maladroit machinations can be overlooked when Birds of Prey makes it abundantly clear that fun is on the menu.     

    Keeping the shortcomings of the storyline at bay becomes a lot easier thanks to the cast’s performances and the multiple running gags that stick their landing.
    Robbie’s frenzied energy suffuses life, but Ewan McGregor’s tongue-in-cheek flamboyant take on Sionis – as Black Mask, who’s in a complicated relationship with henchman Victor Zsasz – is a scene-stealer.
    Despite the high level of candy-coated fun, the movie earns its R-rating with its forays into violence. Harley loves crunching bones and smashing people with baseball bats and carnival mallets. The Huntress lives for stabbing opponents and slaying with crossbows. Zsasz is a sadistic creep with a penchant for skinning flesh and collecting human faces.
    And yet the combination of whimsy and wildness works far better than it should. Eventually, the narrative ties the plot threads together to deliver a satisfying finale, with the cast finally getting to play off each other as a dysfunctional unit.
    But there’s a feeling that the story could have been told much better without the Tarantino-style structure that requires some work on the viewer’s part to stitch various sequences together.
    As well, most of the characters are only fleshed out minimally, as they’re only developed as much as can be done in an hour and 49 minutes.
    Still, Harley and the gang deliver a high-level of entertainment to the proceedings, and offers up an enjoyable cartoonish romp that whets the craving for the next ladies’ night out.


#birdsofprey  #buzzmarketing



MISSION STATEMENT

  MOVIE Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning Director  Christopher McQuarrie Review  Ray Chan You don’t really need to have seen the...